Blog Archives

Support the Aerosol Seven – Letter from Melanie Van der Walt

Firstly I just need to validate your article – on why the Aerosol Seven should not be charged – as very well written! Secondly I would like to bring the point back to the more humanitarian side of this whole incident.

I have in honest truth never really been introduced to the culture of graffiti. Not that I don’t like it – it is art – and art is in the end in the eye of the beholder. But I do live for culture, such as skateboarding and surfing where “normality” and the every-Saturday-rugby-scene are not appealing at all. I used to skate, but being a mother and having a career, the body doesn’t seem to fit these days. My own fault of course.

I met one of those involved, spoke to him. And it has been a while since I befriended someone (as most publications in relation hereto would state as “youngster”), who has such good manners and personality… And being described as a vandal and branded as a criminal just doesn’t suit AT ALL! You know that he is after all (as most of the group or maybe even all) an honest working person as well.

But what really saddens me is the fact that I published some poetry and that he actually asked me about it – but never even mentioned the fact that he is so talented himself. If the actions were intended to “destroy and destruct” the city walls, don’t they honestly think these “illicit gang members” would go about bragging? But now their right to their talent is being denied. And silence must prevail … And the label he must carry is as a vandal and nihilist.

I work with REAL criminals quite often and the CHARGES the Metro wants to impose are highly misplaced and I will personally strive to get him the best legal help in my ability as possible, which proper defense all of them deserve!


– Meanie Van der Walt


Open Letter – Mr Wizid

To Whom It May Concern
I was supposed to be painting that wall on Sunday with Yeh2, luckily I went on a breakfast run with my bike club and therefore missed the drama.
The burning question I have for the media, all aspects of media, is how are huge corporate companies that advertise on TV, magazines etc.  allowed to associate their products with “gang markings” such as graffiti Across the spectrum we have brands like HEITA (Telkoms own cellular service), Ford Cars, the ever annoying 35050 ads which charge R7,50 per sms and repetitively run back-to-back all night long across E-TVand many other force-fed brands running campaigns where graffiti, street art etc is the medium used on NATIONAL TELEVISION to promote their products?

Read the rest of this entry

%d bloggers like this: